![]() About a year ago we bought a Samsung Series 7 TV. Wow, I guess I am several years late to the party but this issue still persists. Opened the audio module and found a badly corroded Duracell battery the destroyed the audio alert module. The only way to fight a big bureaucracy is with an even bigger bureaucracy-especially one with the power to regulate. Reported to OEM, reported to my company ( already decided to stop using Duracells at all locations worldwide, but even better…reported to FAA! Therefore, we had not seen premature failures previously, but really? Eight months? Our practice is to change these two cheap batteries at the same time we are required to change the $200 OEM battery. OEM states, in writing, that the batteries should last 10 years in service. (Actually, could have flown ubder the regs because the main unit pasted all tests, but I will not sign off anything when there is a problem I dont understand) Since the batteries were only 8 months old and since the OEM states that the off the shelf batteries should last 10 years, I did not check the batteries at first. These are off the shelf Duracell batteries.Ĭame to fly the aircraft and the remote test module was flashing. The others are small CR2 lithium batteries for the remote test module and remote audio warning module. It takes three batteries - one for the transmitter itself (a $200 OEM battery) that must be changed every two years by FAA regs. Installed a new emergency locator transmitter in an aircraft in May 2021. ![]() Absent of facts, Judge Saylor said it is impossible to tell how widespread of an issue this is. Judge Saylor says it isn’t clear whether or not the leak guarantee is specifically related to storing the batteries.Ĭarlson and Yusuf allege that more than 30 people complained on Duracell’s website about batteries failing, but Judge Saylor stated that none of them were from Massachusetts. ![]() The plaintiffs claim that by omitting the information, the manufacturers misled customers into buying batteries that could leak and ruin electronic devices. The Duracell class action lawsuit alleged that Procter & Gamble were aware that their batteries could leak under normal use but concealed the information in order to increase sales. According to the battery users, they had both seen the 10-year Duralock guarantee on the package label prior to purchasing and believed that the product would not leak for the full decade. Plaintiffs Carlson and Yusuf of Massachusetts filed the Duracell leaky battery class action lawsuit in November 2014. For these reasons, Judge Saylor decided to dismiss the Duracell class action lawsuit. The Duracell battery class action lawsuit did not contain allegations that the product purchased by the plaintiffs actually leaked nor did it allege that P&G or The Gillette Company failed to make good on their guarantee by replacing the batteries. According to Saylor, a “guarantee” is simply a promise that the manufacturer will replace the product or refund the purchase price if the item does not work as expected. In the motion to dismiss the Duracell leaky battery class action lawsuit, Judge Saylor states that all manufactured products are susceptible to failing because they are designed and manufactured by human beings, and human beings make mistakes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |